There are two societies.

A: A society that is "the set of all people

B: A society that is "the set of people with whom I interact".

B is a subset of A

People can only observe B.

There is no "right for others to exist" in the latter world.

If you don't want a person P in your observation range on a social networking site, you can mute him or her.

Can make person P non-existent from that society.

Each individual has a subjective society and the right to ignore others P in that society.

No one else P has the right to be ignored.

Should be named.

Objective society is a conceptual entity, and whether it is real or not cannot be verified.

How did this story come about?

Broadlisting for Governor.

We did some broad listening within the company.

Many people think of a city or a country when they hear the word "society," but a company is also a society.

The company is not a subset of the capital...(some people live in other prefectures).

Not even a subset of countries (can work remotely from other countries)

If "the set of all people" is society A, then there exists a "society X such that it is a subset of society A."

There may be people p who are forced to do child labor in Africa, but most Japanese do not observe it and usually ignore it in their lives.

No, wait, what? There's someone in your company who "doesn't know you exist because they haven't observed you and usually ignore you".

I mean, for each individual, there's a social B called "the set of people observing."

This is defined by personal observation, so of course it is subjective and varies from person to person

A: If we believe that a community exists objectively, independent of individual perceptions, then it is a conceptual entity and cannot be verified as real.

---